ToolDriftRE-COUNTED EVERY NIGHT
COUNTED 08:56 UTC4 READS FAILEDRead API
Menu
COUNTED 08:56 UTC4 READS FAILED
59 models ranked12 boards36 tools tracked, 7 not what they werecaptured 24 Sep 2026against 23 Sep 202616 rose · 10 fell · 75 held · 10 newadoption, not capability
COMPARISONS/MAGIC PATTERNS VS ONLOOK

Magic PatternsVSOnlook

Read from each vendor’s own pages last night, so it does not go stale the way a written comparison does.

MAGIC PATTERNS
Not read
ONLOOK
Not read
CHANGES ON EITHER
0
CAVEATS
NONE
DESIGN TO CODEREAD NIGHTLY FROM THE VENDORS’ OWN PAGESVERDICT DERIVED FROM THE ROWS BELOW
Contents
THE VERDICTderived from the rows below, so it cannot say anything the table does not

On the prices each vendor publishes about itself, Magic Patterns starts at Not read and Onlook at Not read. Onlook takes your own API key; the other bundles model usage, so its headline price is closer to the whole bill. Onlook is open source under Apache-2.0; the other is proprietary. Every figure on this page was read from the two vendors' own pages in last night's run rather than written down once, which is the only reason it is still the current answer. ToolDrift sells neither and takes no referral fee on either.

SIDE BY SIDE9 asserted rows, 5 measured
COMPARED ONMAGIC PATTERNSONLOOK
ASSERTED · WHAT EACH VENDOR PUBLISHES ABOUT ITSELF
CategoryDesign to codeDesign to code
VendorMagic PatternsOnlook
StatusActiveActive
How it chargesSubscriptionHybrid
Entry priceNot readNot read
Default modelNone, you chooseNone, you choose
Your own keyNo, bundled onlyYes
SourceProprietaryOpen source · Apache-2.0
PlansNo named tier on Magic Patterns's pricing page could be read with a price beside it.No named tier on Onlook's pricing page could be read with a price beside it.
MEASURED · COUNTED ON THE LAST NIGHTLY RUN
Starsnot measured26.8K
Maintenancenot measured92/100
Days since last pushnot measured30
Top model in itnot measurednot measured
Its volumenot measurednot measured
THE QUESTIONS3 answered from the rows above

Is Magic Patterns or Onlook cheaper?

On the cheapest option each vendor publishes: Magic Patterns is Not read and Onlook is Not read. Treat both as an allowance rather than a bill, every tool in this category meters model usage on top of the plan, and which one costs more in practice depends on the models you drive and how hard. The tier prices are the part that can be checked from outside, so they are the part this page prints.

Can I use my own API key with Magic Patterns or Onlook?

Magic Patterns: no, model usage is bundled. Onlook: yes. It is the row that decides whether the subscription price is most of what you pay or a fraction of it: a tool that takes your own key charges for the software, and one that does not is reselling inference with a margin you cannot see.

Are Magic Patterns and Onlook still maintained?

Active and Active as of last night's read. Magic Patterns publishes no repository this site tracks, so there is no push date to read; Onlook's repository was last pushed 30 days ago and it scores 92/100 on maintenance. This is the question a written comparison cannot answer, because it was true on the day it was published and nobody went back.

WHAT HAS CHANGED ON EITHER OF THEM0 entries since tracking began

Neither has moved. No price change, no tier added or withdrawn, no change of ownership on either of them since tracking began.